The main sources I have gathered so far have been articles from The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, and various Internet articles by legitimate writers. One thing to focus on would be the environmental effect of both. Are e-readers better because they use fewer trees or does the pollution that goes into making an e-reader out way the benefits. Another topic would be the social implications. In one article the case was made that the new technology will completely change the way people read. People no longer will be without access to a new title and thus will be able to only read what they what, as well as have the ability to shares books more easily as friends can simply download the story as well immediately. Another thing to talk about would be an idea presented in an article about the new method of reading affecting the old way. The argument was that it would push books to achieve a higher level, and perhaps become more of an art form than just a casual pickup.
Some problems in the paper could be organizing all the different facets of the argument. A way to solve this is by ordering them by importance and using overlapping ideas to connect them together better. Perhaps bring everything bak to an umbrella idea. Besides this I see no problem finding sources to back up my ideas, but I do need to figure out a more concise argument along with a stronger point of view for my paper.

